Contact.
Every score is meant to be challengeable. If we mis-graded evidence, mis-extracted a claim, or applied the rubric wrong, tell us. Corrections update the evidence corpus and ripple through every affected score.
01Direct email
- [email protected] — score disputes, missing citations, algorithm critique
- [email protected] — everything else
02Feedback form
Fill in what you can. Submit opens your default email client with the message pre-filled — nothing is stored in your browser or sent to a server.
03How to challenge a score well
For disputes, what helps us triage fastest:
- The account handle and the specific claim family name (visible in the expanded claim row).
- The exact component you disagree with (A Evidence / B Scoping / C Uncertainty / D Counterevidence / E Commercial / F Safety).
- At least one stronger or more-recent source than the one we cited — guideline, Cochrane review, or landmark trial.
- If you're the account owner: any post we missed context on (a follow-up reply, a thread we only read the first tweet of).
Feedback that fits this template gets a response + either a corpus update or a clear explanation of why we scored it the way we did.
04What we don't respond to
- Demands that a specific account be scored higher without citing evidence we missed.
- Requests to remove an account's report because the owner disagrees with it.
- General grievances that the methodology is wrong without pointing at a specific component.
The corpus and the scoring rubric are both public and versioned. That's how the system earns its name — not by pretending to be definitive, but by being correctable in the open.